British Cycling praised for banning trans athletes from female category races
Gender critical activists have praised British Cycling for introducing a new policy which bans transgender women racing in the female category, saying it’s a ‘step in the right direction’.
The comments came after Emily Bridges revealed she may give up competitive cycling and emigrate after the sport’s governing body in Britain banned transgender women from racing, branding it a ‘genocide against us’.
The cyclist, who set a national junior men’s record over 25 miles in 2018 before transitioning, claimed British Cycling has homophobic coaches and compared bosses to the Nazis, declaring: ‘I’m having to consider an exit plan from this terrible island’.
British Cycling decided it will change their current men’s category to an ‘open’ category, where transgender women can compete against other male-born riders, while the female category will be reserved for those who were female at birth.
Former female athletes including Sharron Davies and Mara Yamauchi have welcomed the new rules as ‘a good day for common sense and equality of opportunities in sport for women’.
Emily Bridges hit out at British Cycling’s policy to ban transgender women from female races
Emily has revealed she may give up competitive cycling and emigrate
Bridges, pictured left in August 2018 competing as a man, Zach, had set a national junior men’s record over 25 miles in the same year. Now known as Emily Bridges, she was going to race against women including Laura Kenny in March last year but this was stopped. Now there is a ban in place
The new policy ends Emily Bridges’ dream of competing for Great Britain or Wales in women’s races and puts pressure on the sport’s international federation, the UCI, to strengthen their own rules.
She condemned the rule changes in a scathing Instagram post, calling British Cycling a ‘failed organisation’ and describing their decision as a ‘violent act’. She also suggest that ‘elite riders’ are influencing policy, in what could be viewed as a thinly-veiled attack on a number of female riders who discussed a boycott if Emily was allowed to race, including one with Dame Laura Kenny last year.
‘British Cycling has just banned us from racing,’ she wrote. ‘They have no authority to control this conversation anymore. Cycling is still one of the whitest, straightest sports out there and you couldn’t care less.
‘I know a lot of people will think I’m being dramatic,’ Bridges continued. ‘I’m having to consider an exit plan from this terrible island and figure out what point enough is enough. It terrifies me to exist at the moment… I don’t even know if I want to race my bike any more.’
She also claimed she is ‘terrified to exist’.
‘I agree there needs to be a nuanced policy discussion and continue to conduct research. This hasn’t happened.
‘Research isn’t being viewed critically, or any discussion about the relevance of the data to specific sports.
‘I’ve given my body up to science for the last two years, and this data will be out soon.
‘There is actual, relevant data coming soon and discussions need to be had.’
The new policy relates to all competitive activity – any race or event involving timing, ranking or prizes – and will come into force in full by the end of this year.
Transgender women will still be allowed to ride with women in non-competitive cycling settings, such as the Breeze community programme.
Emily Bridges was previously declared as eligible to compete in women’s events by British Cycling – but now she is banned
Women’s racing (pictured, Anna Shackley of the United Kingdom competing earlier this year) will be limited to only those who are female born under the new regulations
Emily Bridges, seen here riding as a man in the Tour de Gwent in April 2018, before she began her transition
In an Instagram post, Bridges hit out at British Cycling for their handling of the issue, and said that she was fed up with the conversation being dictated ‘on their terms, and being controlled by them’.
In her damning statement, she said: ‘British Cycling is a failed organisation, the racing scene is dying under your watch and all you do is take money from petrochemical companies and engage in culture wars.’
She noted that the announcement follows a wave of policies across America affecting transgender people.
Bridges wrote: ‘This is a violent act. When the government is expressing admiration towards Ron Desantis’ fascist state which kidnaps children, and is itching to pass legislation to ban us from public life, this is a violent act.
‘British Cycling are supporting this, they are furthering a genocide against us. Bans from sport is how it starts, look at what is going on in America.’
She accepted that ‘a nuanced policy discussion’ needs to take place, but said that British Cycling have not done this.
She added: ‘I’ve given my body up to science for the last two years, and this data will be out soon.’
Bridges said she was strongly considering leaving Britain – which she calls ‘this terrible island’ – because of the high level of hate crimes committed against transgender people.
But prominent gender critical athletes have slammed her comments and praised British Cycling’s new policy.
Sharron Davies MBE tweeted: ‘Thank you for at last using the science and asking your athletes. Females have always been worthy of fair sport. And should be at recreational level too.
But a good day for common sense and equality of opportunities in sport for women.’
The former Olympic swimmer retweeted a post that read: ‘”Violent” is what it’s felt like to many females in cycling because of the colonization of their sport.’
Outspoken gender critical activist and former Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies welcomed the new cycling rules
Prominent gender critical athletes have slammed her comments and praised British Cycling’s new policy
She told Sky News that she was ‘really pleased’ with the policy change.
‘The science has been there for quite a long time and it has been ignored in lots of cases for many years now and also the voices of female athletes have been ignored. It’s been a good day but I don’t think it probably goes far enough.
‘I do think that recreational female cyclists are also worthy of fair competition. But it is a good step in the right direction.
‘And nobody is being banned. This is just about fair competition. It’s nothing more than that. Everyone is welcome in cycling as they are welcome in sport across the world.’
And Mara Yamauchi, a British long-distance runner, denied Bridges’ claim that trans women are banned from cycling.
The marathon runner added: ‘All the stuff about genocide and violence – funny how no mention of the 2-3 women killed in the UK EVERY WEEK by men.’
British Cycling chief executive Jon Dutton said: ‘Our new policies are the product of a robust nine-month review process, which we know will have a very real-world impact for our community both now and in the future.
‘I am confident that we have developed policies that both safeguard the fairness of cyclesport competition, whilst ensuring all riders have opportunities to participate.’
British Cycling’s previous rules allowed transgender women to compete in the female category providing they had lowered their testosterone levels to below five nanomoles per litre over a 12-month period.
However, they suspended that policy in April last year after Bridges – who was previously on Great Britain’s Academy as a male rider named Zach – attempted to enter the women’s race at the National Omnium Championships, where she would have come up against five-time Olympic champion Laura Kenny.
Emily Bridges said she is considering leaving Britain because of the abuse of transgender people
British Cycling chief executive Jon Dutton confirmed the bombshell news on Friday morning
British Cycling then began a consultation with female and transgender riders and reviewed the available medical evidence, concluding that ‘even with the suppression of testosterone, trans women who transition post-puberty retain a performance advantage’.
That is the key medical reason for the landmark policy change and they have taken advice from sports and equality lawyers, Mills & Reeve, to ensure their new rules comply with the Equality Act should they receive any legal challenges.
British Cycling attempted to contact around 10 known transgender and non-binary riders – including Bridges – to inform them of the new policy prior to it being published.
‘I am sorry that it’s taken so long to get to this point,’ said Dutton, who only began his role last month. ‘We appreciate this has been an incredibly difficult period. It has caused anxiety, uncertainty and distress for many riders and we have a duty of care to support those people.
‘But today is about leadership and giving that absolute clarity and direction to remove that uncertainty, however difficult that may be. On the competitive policy, fairness is absolutely the driving factor.’
British Cycling’s announcement comes less than four weeks after the sport’s latest transgender storm, when American Austin Killips won the Tour of the Gila – the first transgender rider to triumph at an official UCI stage race.
The UCI currently allow transgender women to compete in female events as long as they have reduced their testosterone levels to 2.5 nmol/L over a two-year period.
However, in the wake of the Killips row, they announced they will be ‘reopening consultation’ regarding their rules and will decide on any changes by August, when it is likely they too will ban transgender women from the female category.
American Austin Killips became the first transgender rider to win an official UCI stage race
In the meantime, British Cycling and the UCI have different policies – but Dutton confirmed that Great Britain teams for international events will be selected under the new national rules.
British Cycling’s move follows that of other sports in recent months, with World Athletics, UK Athletics, World Aquatics and British Triathlon all among the governing bodies who have recently banned transgender women from the female category and are moving towards changing their men’s category to open.
‘We have always been very clear that this is a challenge far greater than one sport,’ added Dutton. ‘We remain committed to listening to our communities and working with our fellow sporting bodies to monitor changes in the scientific and policy landscape, to ensure that sport is inclusive for all.
‘We have been open and transparent with the UCI on our decision and will work collaboratively with them to ensure a seamless implementation over the coming months.’